NATIONAL COALITION OF SCHOOL BUS SAFETY NEWS 2007
Nearly 1/2 Million School Buses on Our Nation's
Highways and They Don't Count as a Forth Major Concern???
An eLetter was
sent to the Detroit Press reporter that wrote the story, ''Smaller
school buses to get belts.'' Any willing please critique the letter
for any possible errors in fact:
November 20, 2007
Dear David
Shepardson,
Please Note:
The story, ''Smaller school buses to get belts,'' is riddled with so
many questionable assumptions that it seems a longer letter than
might be the usual is necessary.
The
industry's and friends usual arguments against seat belts on the big
school buses are virtually identical arguments used against seat
belts in U.S. automobiles during the 1950's.
How many
lives each year are actually saved with seat belts installed in
automobiles?
New York, New
Jersey, Louisiana, Florida, California and now Texas require lap or
three-point shoulder belts on their big school buses.
School
districts in states using belts but not mandated include Arizona,
Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Massachusetts,
Missouri, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma and Vermont.
"No rule, but
Chicago does it" -- Mandate or no mandate, the Chicago Public
Schools have had seat belts on buses since 1975, spokesman Mike
Vaughn said, "It makes students safer." (July 24, 2007, Chicago
Sun-Times)
These states
and school districts apparently solved the installation costs,
evacuation issues and the other arguments promoted against seat
belts.
Over 700
school districts, as of 1998, had seat belts installed on their
school buses. There is more than adequate data available to compile
actual crash data. But injury and death data is difficult to assess
because seat belts reduce bus driver distraction, which in turn
reduce crashes.
Although seat
belts are promoted to reduce capacity, there is no loss in capacity
where lap belts are installed.
And where
3-point restraints are installed on the big school buses?
Arthur L.
Yeager, an expert on seat belt use in New Jersey, where 16,000
school buses were equipped with seat belts by 1998, rejects the
reduced capacity assumption. "Those with actual experience with the
3-point belts reported an actual increase in seating capacity for
middle school and high school children. These children are currently
assigned two to a seat, four across and now the buses can
accommodate five across - a 25% increase in capacity. Fewer buses
and less cost!"
NHTSA may
have warned in the past that adding the belts could be expensive,
reduce seating capacity and reduce ridership. What is missing in the
story is the new SafeGuard FlexSeat™ that can safely transport three
elementary school children or two high school kids on a standard
39-inch seat. This innovative bus seat with three lap-shoulder belts
resolves capacity issues and enhances bus safety with its unique
approach to maintaining compartmentalization. With the FlexSeat, one
seat fits all. With SmartFrame, the FlexSeat observes the full
spirit of FMVSS 222 compartmentalization. Even an unrestrained child
receives full compartmentalization protection, regardless of whether
the child in front is restrained. (FlexSeat Information:
http://www.safeguardseat.com/bus/products_flex.htm)
All this
attention on 3-point belts and their cost may be nothing more than
another way to discourage use through over engineering. The reality
is that behind the scenes last year 28-percent of IC Corporation's,
the nation's largest integrated school bus manufacture, new school
bus production in the U.S. are factory installed with seat belts --
25-percent with lap belts; 3-percent with 3-point belts.
So where are
all the actual brain, neck and back injuries that these safety
devices are supposed to cause?
Those
injuries and also ejection's occur on the school buses not equipped
with seat belts and often at side impact and low speed rollover
crashes, not just at high speeds, and not on seat belt equipped
school buses where use is also required.
Had the
industry not made everyone so paranoid over lap belts on the big
school buses it would still be considered safe to install these
simple devices for children to use, in my opinion. My personal
experience with these devices would indicate lap or 3-point belts
are acceptable options.
I firmly
believe that many lives could have been saved had their installation
been required decades ago.
James
Kraemer, Director
2safeschools.org
back to News
top
|